- #Hero 6 quick desktop delete files how to#
- #Hero 6 quick desktop delete files windows 10#
- #Hero 6 quick desktop delete files plus#
(A better solution is dedicated battery backed RAM drives, but they are very expensive.) If you are doing it manually, then use the command line.Ĭan you convert some of your memory to a RAM drive? I bought extra RAM and it worked brilliantly because the files were supposed to be deleted as part of my testing. Here is what I did to get good performance.Īlways delete the entire folder and avoid the recycling bin. I had this exact problem with some automated testing that created and deleted thousands of files for each test run. I have personally use ImDisk Virtual Disk Driver, (no affiliation), with a great amount of success and it's free. If you have the RAM, (and don't mind the risk of loosing the images), you could create a RAM drive and use that. You could also try using a flash drive to see if that helps however your results would be highly dependent on the drive you use. Upgrading to an SSD would help with your work since their IOPS are normally measured in the thousands, and mechanical drives are measured in the hundreds. The del command on the other hand doesn't try to be nice at all, and deletes as quickly as possible. The thing to keep in mind now is that Explorer tries to play nice with everything else running on the system while it is deleting, which can be slow. It's basically a very small write to the hard drive, (it's writing 0s to the it), so it's a quick IOP, which can do a lot more than what's listed on the Wiki since the Wiki is listing random and sustained writes.
#Hero 6 quick desktop delete files how to#
What's basically happening is that the OS is telling the hard drive to erase the metadata of the file in the partition table, which removes it from view, (it's still there, but the OS no longer knows how to access it). The Wikipedia has a list of the rough amount of IOPS that mechanical and solid state drives can perform on their site. In one of your comments you state that you're using a mechanical hard drive, and the amount of IOPS that they can perform is pretty small compared to SSDs. To add to the answers provided, the reason that the deletion operations take so long is due the type of hard drive you're using. Then check the logs and ensure the actions match what you want. You'll want to LOG when using MT, there is definitely a measurable delay when displaying the output on screen.īy using /MT:128 as an option, it will max out the amount of files it can 'delete' at one time.Īlso note that if this is your first time with Robocopy, you should do a dry run with the /L flag: /L :: List only - don't copy, timestamp or delete any files. Redirect output using /LOG option for better performance. This option is incompatible with the /IPG and /EFSRAW options. N must be at least 1 and not greater than 128.
MT:128 :: Do multi-threaded copies with n threads (default 8). W:1 :: Wait time between retries: default is 30 seconds. R:1 :: number of Retries on failed copies: default 1 million.
#Hero 6 quick desktop delete files plus#
MIR :: MIRror a directory tree (equivalent to /E plus /PURGE). Just make a new empty directory, or reference a current empty directory, then run the following command: robocopy x:\path\to\emptyfolder x:\path\to\delete /MIR /R:1 /W:1 /MT:128 /LOG:x:\path\to\logfile.log I don't have any raw data or actual metrics that this is faster than any of the already mentioned options, but it is considerably faster than using the Explorer shell. In my experience, sending any sort of delete command is not as fast as using Robocopy to /MIR an empty folder to the destination. If you give the volumes descriptive labels like TempJpeg1 then formatting them is probably as mistake-proof as deleting a huge directory from the command line.ĭealing with roaming profiles, I've seen this quite a bit. Another is that you can accidentally format the wrong volume, but really any approach to mass deletion of files carries the risk of deleting the wrong ones. One disadvantage of reformatting to delete is that you need to be an elevated administrator. This is obviously not an option if you need the files to survive a reboot. Even ordinary recursive deletion on the RAM disk might be much faster depending on what's causing the slowdown. If the total size of all live batches is smaller than your physical RAM, you could also put them on RAM disks (using, e.g., ImDisk), still formatting or unmounting the volume to delete them. Tens of thousands of 20K files sounds like not too many gigabytes. The speed of reformatting is independent of what's on the volume since it ignores the existing file system and just writes a new one.
#Hero 6 quick desktop delete files windows 10#
Windows 10 has native support for mounting files as disk volumes. I don't know why Explorer is so slow, but you might consider putting each batch of images on a separate filesystem volume and quick-formatting the volume to delete them.
0 kommentar(er)
